“ROLE OF TILNILOTPAL GANDUSHA IN MANAGEMENT OF MUKHAPAKA”
Dr. Dubey Vikas
M.D. (Scholar)
Bharti Vidyapeeth AyurvedaCollege,
Dhankawadi, pune 411043
E-mailAddress-
Phone no. – 08237250287, 09479427096
Second Author-
Dr.PATWARDHAN. R.P
M.D. (AYU)
PROFESSOR SWASTHAVRITTA
Bharti Vidyapeeth AyurvedaCollege, Dhankawadi, pune 411043
Phone no.- 09422522723
ABSTRACT:-
Now a day lifestyle is drastically changed. Due to increased pollution,Fast life style, junk food habit and addictions problems of oral health are arising progressively. Therefore there are increased problems regarding bad oral hygiene.Among various Mukharogas, Mukhapaka is Pittaja Nanatmaja and Rakta Pradoshaja Vikara, characterized by VedanayuktaVrana in the Mukhaguha. The lakshanas of Mukhapaka can be co-related with apthous ulcer (recurrent ulcerative stomatitis) explained in modern medical science.
In Ayurveda, non-practice of gandusha etc. are said to be major cause for mukhapaka.Indirectly it infers the importance of gandusha because the physical, thermal and chemical causes of injury to oral cavity (due to exposure to various risk factors) can be better counteracted by practicing gandusha daily. Clinical trial on a single group of 60 patients having mukhapaka,was carried out.
Patients was given Tilnilotpaladi kwatha Gandusha for period of 7 days in every morning empty stomach.
60 patients studied, maximum number of patients(51.66) belonged to the age group of 20-30 years,Male sex (65%), and upper middle socio economics status (41.6%),mixed diet (61.66),addicted to smoking(38.33%),occupation (20% ) IT professionals.
32% individuals have shown good response,53% sown moderate Response,and 15% shown mild response.
KEYWORDS: Mukhapak, Tilnilotpaladi Yoga, Apthous ulcer.
INTRODUCTION-:
-: Mukha Swasthya (oral hygiene) has gained importance now a day, because mukha is such anga, which is exposed to many risk factors in day-to-day life.
Ø Due to increased pollution, junk food habits and addictions like tobacco-guthaka chewing, smoking, soft drinks; problems are arising progressively.
Ø Therefore, problems regarding bad oral hygiene are progressively increased.
Ø In Ayurvedic text, Aphthous ulcer is denoted as ‘Sarvasar rog’ or ‘Mukhapaka’ due to its spread in the complete oral cavity (mukha) [2, 3, 4].
Ø Mukhapaka is Pittaja Nanatmaja & rakta Pradoshaja Vikara, characterized by Vedanayukta Vrana in the Mukha guha.
Ø The lakshanas of Mukhapaka can be co-related with Apthous ulcer; explained in modern medical science
AIM :-
Management of Mukhapaka by Tilnilotpaladi Gandusha.
OBJECTIVES :-
To study the role of Gandusha as an Upakrama of Dinacharya.
To assess the role of Tilnelotpaladi Gandusha in the prevention of recurrent Mukhapaka.
To study in detail about Mukhapaka. (Apthous ulcer).
This section includes following headings.
1. Ayurvedic review
a. Mukha Shareera
b. Mukhapaka
c. Gandusha
2. Modern review
a. Anatomy of oral cavity
b. Pathology related to Apthous ulcer.
MUKHAPAKA
Ø Mukhapaka is a condition characterized by vedana & shopha yukta vrana in the mukha guha pratyangas.
Ø Mukhapaka can be correlated with a disease entity ulcerative stomatitis, in which apthous ulcers are very common with recurrent episodes.
Types – Acc. to Charak, Sushrut & Madhav nidan
1. Vataja Mukhapaka
2. Pittaja Mukhapaka
3. Kaphaja Mukhapaka
Vaghbata - Raktaja and Sannipataja mukhapaka.
GANDUSHA
Ø The word Gandusha is formed by Gadi + Gandescha which mean mukha purnam i.e. filling the mouth.
Gandusha is the procedure of holding any liquid in the mouth to its full capacity without any movement inside. It is usually done with drava (liquid
TYPES
Based on doshagnata and karmukata Gandusha is classified mainly into four types. They are -
• Snaihika (lubricating) – indicated in diseases of vata
• Shamana (matigating) – indicated in diseases of pitta
• Shodhana (purificatory) - indicated in diseases of kapha
• Ropana (healing) – indicated in ulcerations of mukha
Anatomy of Mouth
Ø A mucosa lined cavity is also called the oral cavity or Buccal (bucca-cheeks) cavity.
Ø It is formed by cheeks laterally, soft and hard palate superiorly.
Ø Anterior opening is oral orifice & posteriorly it is continuous with the oropharynx.
REVIEW OF STOMATITIS :
Definition: General term for diffuse inflammation of the mouth.
Apthous ulcer (recurrent ulcerative stomatitis) :
Ø This is a commonest recurrent condition of unknown etiology characterized by painful superficial ulcers in movable mucosa of the mouth.
Ø Generally these ulcers are seen in buccal mucosa, lips, tongue, floor of the mouth, soft palate & oro-pharynx.
ETIOLOGY :-
Ø The cause is obscure.
Ø Some probable causative factors are emotional stress, viral infections, endocrine disorders psycho-somatic factors, habitual constipation, auto-immune reaction.
TYPES :-
There are three main clinical types
1. Minor apthae
2. Major apthae
3. Herpetiform apthae
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Title of study:-
“Role of Tilnilotpaladi Gandusha in Management of Mukhapaka”
Place of study:-
OPD and IPD of B.V.D.U. Ayurved Hospital, Pune ,Maharashtra (India).
Sample Size:- Clinical trial on a single group of 60 persons having mukhapaka, was carriedout.
Drug & Duration of Therapy:-
Selection of Upakram :-
Upakrama :- Gandusha
Time :- In Morning (After Dantadhavana)
Form :- Kashaya (Decoction)
Quantity :- 80-120 ml (As per oral liquid holding capacity of the patients)
Drug Ingredients-
Tilnilotpaladi yoga:-
1.Tila (Sesamum Indicum)
2.Nilotpal (Nymphaea stella)
3.Ghee
4.Sugar,
5.Milk
6.Honey. (5,10)
Procedure :-
Ø The patient asked to sit in erect posture.
Ø The neck, cheeks and the forehead of the patient to be treated with Gandusha, massaged and fomented.
Ø Gandush has been so long held in the mouth by the patient till the aggravated dosha accumulated in regions of the cheeks or secreted through the nostrils & the eyes.
Inclusion Criteria :-
Ø Patient complaining of recurrent Mukhapaka.
Ø Patients between age group of 20-50 years.
Ø Patients of both sex included in the study.
Exclusion Criteria :-
As per Bhavaprakasha Purvakhanda, patient contraindicated for Gandusha excluded –
Ø Gandusha is contraindicated in unconscious, poisoned, weak, krisha person, patient suffering from bleeding disorders and conjunctivitis.
Ø Patient having chronic or carcinogenic ulcers in oral cavity.
Ø Mukhapaka due to any other disorders e.g. Syphilis, AIDS, Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever etc.
Ø Patients suffering from any other systemic disorders.
ASSESMENT CRITERIA
Efficacy of the therapy was assessed in the signs and symptoms before and after the course of Gandusha.
It was assessed on the basis of self-formulated scoring scale to signs and symptoms of Mukhapaka as follows.
Assessment of parameters for Mukhapaka:
1. Ruja (pain) – using VAS scale for pain Assessment
No pain |
0 |
Mild-pain during churning of food |
1 |
Moderate-pain during talking and gets relief by topical anesthetics |
2
|
Severe- pain even during rest, No relief by topical anesthetics |
3
|
2. Daha (burning sensation)
No daha |
0 |
Mild-tolerable, no need of cooling agents Likeglycerin or cold juice |
1
|
Moderate-intolerable,Gets relief by cooling agents |
2
|
Severe- intolerable, no relief by cooling agents |
3
|
3. Raktavarnata (Reddness)
No redness |
0 |
Dull red or pink red |
1 |
Colour of mazanta |
2 |
Bright red |
3 |
4. Size of the vrana
Size of the vrana 0 mm |
0 |
Size of the vrana between 0—5 mm |
1 |
Size of the vrana between 6—10 mm |
2 |
Size of the vrana more than 10 mm |
3 |
5. No of Vrana
No Vrana |
0 |
Number of Vrana 0 - 1 |
1 |
Number of Vrana 1 - 3 |
2 |
Number of Vrana more than 3 |
3 |
Assessment of Parameter for mukhaswasthya
1. Frequency of attack:-
No relapse up to 2 Months |
0 |
One attack every 2 Months |
1 |
One attack every Months. |
2 |
Two or more attacks in a months |
3 |
FOLLOW UP
Follow up will be done periodically for total duration of 21 days.
1st follow up :- 3th day
2nd follow up:- 7th day
3rd follow up :- 14st day (Post Treatment)
4th follow up:- 21th day (Post Treatment)
Observation and results
1.Age wise distribution :-There were maximum no. of patients i.e.51.67 % in age group 20-30 and 38.33% in age group 30-40 also minimum no. of patients i.e.10% in age group 40-50.
2.Sex wise distribution
Sex |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
Female |
21 |
35.00% |
Male |
39 |
65.00% |
Total |
60 |
100% |
|
There were Maximum no. of patients i.e. 65 % were males and 35% were females.This indicated its more incidence rate in males.
3.Dietary Habitat wise distribution
There were Maximum no. of patients i.e. 61.67% were mixed and minimum i.e.38.33% were vegetarian. The ancient Ayurvedic physicians were aware of the ‘Apathyakara Ahara and Vihara' (unsalutary life style and food habits) as the most important causative agent [6, 7, 8].
Diet |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
mixed |
37 |
61.67% |
vegetarian |
23 |
38.33% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
4.Marital status wise distribution
Marital status |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
married |
39 |
65.00% |
unmarried |
21 |
35.00% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
It was found that maximum number of patients i.e. 65% were married, While 35 % Patients were unmarried.
5.Occupation wise distribution
Occupation |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
Bank Emp |
9 |
15.00% |
BPO |
3 |
5.00% |
Driver |
11 |
18.33% |
Govt job |
2 |
3.33% |
IT |
12 |
20.00% |
Police |
6 |
10.00% |
S/G( security guard) |
5 |
8.33% |
Student |
7 |
11.67% |
Teacher |
5 |
8.33% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
On considering the nature of occupation, it was found that maximum i.e.20% no. of patients were IT professionals while minimum i.e.3.33% no of patients having government job.
6.Vyasanawise distribution:-
Vyasana |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
Alcohol |
12 |
20.00% |
Smoking |
23 |
38.33% |
Tea |
22 |
36.67% |
Tobaco |
3 |
5.00% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
This showed that maximum i.e. 38% patients were having smoking vyasan and mimimum no. of patients i.e.5% having alcohol tobacco vyasan .
7. vihara wise distribution:-
vihara |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
Divaswapna |
10 |
16.67% |
No |
14 |
23.33% |
R.Jagarana |
36 |
60.00% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
Patients with history of ratrijagrana were 60% and 16.67% had history of Diwaswapa.
8.Socio economic condition wise distribution
The classification of patients based on their economic status indicates that people of high socio economic status were more susceptible (41.67%) to mukhapaka.
Socio eco cond |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
Upper middle class |
25 |
41.67% |
middle class |
23 |
38.33% |
Lower class |
12 |
20.00% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
9.Family History wise distribution
Family Histroy |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
no |
35 |
58.33% |
yes |
25 |
41.67% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
|
Here, it was found that maximum numbers of patients i.e. 58.33% were having family history while 41.67% were not having family history.
10.Prakriti Family History
Prakruti |
No of Patients |
Percentage |
kapha- vata |
1 |
1.67% |
pitta- kapha |
28 |
46.67% |
pitta-vataj |
1 |
1.67% |
vata-kapha |
17 |
28.33% |
vata-pitta |
13 |
21.67% |
Total |
60 |
100.00% |
It was found that maximum no. of patients i.e. 46 .67% were belonged to pitta- kaphaPrakriti,, and minimum no. of patients i.e. 1.67% kapha –vataPrakriti.
RESULTS:-
1.Effect of Tilnilotpaladi Yoga on Ruja in the management of Mukhapaka
Ruja (Pain) :-
Grade |
BT |
AT |
||
No. of patients |
BT |
No. of patients |
AT |
|
No Pain |
4 |
6.66% |
32 |
53.33% |
Mild Pain |
36 |
60% |
21 |
35% |
Moderate pain |
20 |
33.33% |
7 |
11.66% |
Sever pain |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
Total |
60 |
100% |
60 |
100% |
Parameter |
N |
Mean |
Std Deviation |
Positive rank |
Negative rank |
Tie |
Z value |
P value |
Interpretation |
||
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
||||||||
Ruja |
60 |
0.766 |
0.253 |
0.721 |
0.536 |
10 |
17 |
24 |
-0.652 |
0 |
S |
Here P value was >0.05 hence accept H0 i.e.
On associated symptoms of Mukhapaka, the improvement observed on Ruja (66.97%) was statistically significant.
2.Effect of Tilnilotpaladi Yoga on Daha in the management of Mukhapaka
Daha (Burning Sensation) :-
Grade |
BT |
AT |
||
No. of patients |
BT |
No. of patients |
AT |
|
No Daha |
0 |
0% |
32 |
53.33% |
Mild Daha |
34 |
56.66% |
28 |
46.66% |
Moderate Daha |
26 |
43.33% |
0 |
0% |
Sever Daha |
00 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
Total |
60 |
100% |
60 |
100% |
Parameter |
N |
Mean |
Std Deviation |
Positive rank |
Negative rank |
Tie |
Z value |
P value |
Interpretation |
||
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
||||||||
Daha |
60 |
2.6 |
0.466 |
0.616 |
0.503 |
0 |
59 |
1 |
0.679 |
0 |
S |
Here P value was <0.05 hence reject H0 i.e.
On associated symptoms of Mukhapaka, the improvement observed (82%)on Daha was statistically significant.
3.Effect of Tilnilotpaladi Yoga on RaktaVarnata of vrana in the management of Mukhapaka
Rakta Varnata of vrana[ Redness] :-
Grade |
BT |
AT |
||
No. of patients |
BT |
No. of patients |
AT |
|
No Redness |
0 |
0% |
14 |
23% |
Dull Red (or) pink red |
33 |
55% |
44 |
73% |
Color of Magenta |
22 |
37% |
2 |
3% |
Bright Red |
5 |
8% |
0 |
0% |
Total |
60 |
100% |
60 |
100% |
Parameter |
N |
Mean |
Std Deviation |
Positive rank |
Negative rank |
Tie |
Z value |
P value |
Interpretation |
||
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
||||||||
Rd.ofVran |
60 |
1.533 |
0.8 |
0.65 |
0.48 |
0 |
38 |
22 |
-5.809 |
0 |
S |
Here P value was <0.05 hence reject H0 i.e.
On associated symptoms of Mukhapaka, the improvement observed (91%)on RaktaVarnata of vrana was ethically significant.
4.Effect of Tilnilotpaladi Yoga on No. Of Vrana in the management of Mukhapaka
Parameter |
N |
Mean |
X |
% of relief |
SD |
Std error |
Z value |
p value |
|||
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
||||||
No.OfVrana |
60 |
1.116 |
0.433 |
0.683 |
61.20% |
0.666 |
0.499 |
0.086 |
0.065 |
7.827 |
0.00003 |
Before treatment the mean score of No.Of Vrana was 1.116 which was reduced to 0.433 after treatment with 61.20% relief also p value is <0.05 hence it is statistically significant .
5.Effect of Tilnilotpaladi Yoga on Size of Vrana in the management of Mukhapaka
Parameter |
N |
Mean |
X |
% of relief |
SD |
Std error |
Z value |
p value |
|||
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
||||||
Size of Vrana |
60 |
0.726 |
0.266 |
0.134 |
63.36% |
0.616 |
0.445 |
0.079 |
0.058 |
6.823 |
0.003 |
Before treatment the mean score of Size of Vrana was 0.726 which was reduced to 0.266 after treatment with 63.36 % relief but p value is <0.05 hence it is statistically significant.
6.Effect of Tilnilotpaladi Yoga on frequency of attack in the management of Mukhapaka:-
Parameter |
N |
Mean |
X |
% of relief |
SD |
Std error |
Z value |
p value |
|||
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
BT |
AT |
||||||
Freq attack |
60 |
0.867 |
0.3 |
0.5667 |
65.39% |
0.5956 |
0.462 |
0.076 |
0.059 |
6.082 |
0.000032 |
Before treatment the mean score of Freq attack was 0.867which was reduced to 0.3 after treatment with 65.39% relief also p value is <0.05 hence it is statistically significant .
7.OVERALL IMPROVEMENT
improvement |
No. of patients |
percentage |
Marked improvement |
19 |
32% |
moderate improvement |
32 |
53% |
Mild improvement |
9 |
15% |
No improvement |
0 |
0% |
Total |
60 |
100% |
The above graph showed that there were 32 % patients have shown good response, 53% shown moderate while only 15% patients have shown mild response
8.Study of Recurrence:-
Grade |
No. of Patients |
% |
|||
Recurrence |
53 |
88.33 |
|||
|
Mild Recurrence |
04 |
6.66 |
||
|
Moderate Recurrence |
03 |
5 |
||
|
Sever Recurrence |
00 |
0 |
||
-88.33% Patient had no. recurrence after 21 days follow up study.
-6.66% patients had recurrence of mild intencity.
-5% patients had moderate degree of recurrence.
Conclusion
The conclusions drawn on the basis of this study are as follows.
1. Among various mukharogas ,mukhapaka is considered as pittaja Nanatmaja and raktapradoshaja vikara ,characterized by vedana Yuktavrana inside the mukhakuhara.Nearly 60% of the population is suffering with this problem.
2. The lakshanas of mukhapaka can be correlated to a clinical entity“Apthous ulcer” (recurrent ulcerative stomatities) explained in the contemporary medical science,which is also characterized by painful Superficial ulcers in the movable mucosa of the mouth with recurrent episodes.
3. Gandusha upakrama of dinacharya on of the important methods Mentioned in Ayurveda for maintenance of oral hygiene.
4. Out of 60 patients studied, maximum number of patients (51.666%) belonged to the age group of 20-30 years, Male sex (65%), and upper middle socio economic status (41.66%), mixed diet (61.66%), addicted to smokinge (38.33%).occupation ( 20% ) IT professionals.
5. Most of the patients were of pitta kaphaprakriti (46.33%), with positive history of ratrijagarana (60%).
6. 32% individuals have shown good response,53% shown moderate Response, and 15% shown mild response.
7. As Tilnilotpaladi Gandusha having madhur,kashyarasa,shetavirya and kaphahe-pittaghnaproperties,It removes aggravated kaph and pitta Guna from oral cavity.
8. Hence from the study it is concluded that,Tilnilotpaladi Gandusha is an important upakrama of Dincharya mentioned in Samhitas which should befolled regularly,in order to prevent Mukharogas and maintain oral hygine.
References:-
1. [1] A Short Textbook of ENT- edited by K.B. Bhargava, S.K. Bhargava & T.M. Shah, 7th Edition-2005, Usha Publication, Mumbai, India, 228-229.
2. [2] Vagbhatta’s Ashtanga Hridayam, Vol. 3 (Uttar sthan), translated by Prof. K.R. Srikanth Murthy, Edition Reprint-2006, and published by Chaukhamba Krishnadas Academy, Varanasi, U.P. India, Chapter 22, 184-197.
3. [3] Illustrated Susruta Samhita of Sushruta, Vol. 1 & 2, translated by Prof. K.R. Srikanth Murthy, Edition Second-2004, published by Chaukhamba Orientalia Publication, Varanasi, U.P. India, Nidansthan Chapter 16-Page no. 563 & Chikitsasthan Chapter 22- Page no. 204-215.
4. [4] Agnivesh’s Charak Samhita (Based on Chakrapani Datta’s Ayurved Dipika), Vol. 4, translated by Dr. Ram Karan Sharma & Vaidya Bhagwan Dash, Edition Reprint-2007, published by Chaukhamba Sanskrit series office, Varanasi, U.P. India, Chikista Sthan- Chapter 26-Page no. 505.
5. [5] Dravyaguna Vigyan, Vol. 2, by Prof. P.V. Sharma, Edition Reprint-2006, published by Chaukambha Bharati Academy, Varanasi, U.P., India, Page no.882 & 585.
6. [6] Bhavprakash of Bhavamisra (Uttarardha Madhyamkhanda), Part 2, 8th Edition-2003, edited with the Vidyotini Hindi Commentary by Pandiat Sri Brahmashankara Mishra published by Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi, U.P., India, Chikistadhikar; Mukharogadhikar, Chapter 66-Page no. 720.
7. [7] Bhaisajya Ratnavali-Vidyotini Hindi Vyakhya Vimarsh Parisishta Samhita-commentary by Shri Ambika Datta Shastri, edited by Kaviraj Rajeshwardatta Shastri, 16th Edition-2002, published by Chaukamba Sanskrit Sanshtan Varanasi, U.P., India, Page no. 676-677.
8. [8] Yogaratnakar (Uttarardha), Vidyitini tika, by Vaidya Shri Lakshmipati Shastri, Edited by Bhishagratna Shri Brahmashankar Shastri, 7th Edition-2002, published by Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi, U.P., India, Mukharoga Nidan/Chikitsa, Page no. 296-97.
9. [9] Dravyaguna Vigyan, Vol. 2, by Prof.Mansi Deshpanday, Edition Reprint-2015, published by Chaukambha Bharati Academy, Varanasi, U.P., India, Page no.457,644,648.
10. [10] Bhavprakash Nighantu (Indian Materia Medica), 13th Edition-2013, edited by Prof. K.C.Chunekar published by Chaukhamba Sanskrit Sansthan, Varanasi, U.P., India, Chikistadhikar; Mukharogadhikar, Page no. 727,743,759,774,639,467.